So, the 4th Circuit maintains that this election is non-partisan in name only.
Okay, let's talk politics -- As of Monday, August 1st, I'll be taking one to two questions per week from ISideWith.com, and posting my position on the answer I would choose. I will happily answer (and prioritize) any questions that you want to ask.
Question for the week of 8/1:
- Do you support Common Core standards?
A step-by-step narrative of a political campaign, from the perspective of a candidate.
Wednesday, July 27, 2016
This Is Why People Get Frustrated With 'The System'
So, some of you have noticed that I haven't been posting recently, and I'll address that after the jump.
First, though -- I am trained to work within the bounds of 'The System'. Heck, I'm decent at navigating bureaucracy. But this is getting ridiculous! Are we in Wake County going to end up in the Supreme Court, or are we simply not going to have elections?
First, though -- I am trained to work within the bounds of 'The System'. Heck, I'm decent at navigating bureaucracy. But this is getting ridiculous! Are we in Wake County going to end up in the Supreme Court, or are we simply not going to have elections?
Wednesday, July 6, 2016
Did the 4th Circuit Decide Wrongly in This Case? (Part III-D, Part IV, Part V, & Concluding Notes and Your Opinions)
Did
the 4th Circuit Wrongly Decide Raleigh
Wake Citizens Association?
If
you have no legal experience… perfect! This is a great “getting your feet wet”
case for reading legal decisions! This post series will analyze the recent ruling by the 4th Circuit section by section. For those who are not experienced reading a legal
decision:
-I
have tried to keep the legal jargon to a minimum.
-Where possible, you’ll see bulleted lists like this one.
-For
this post series, I’ll also critique the majority opinion as necessary
Did the 4th Circuit Decide Wrongly in This Case? (Part III-C)
Did
the 4th Circuit Wrongly Decide Raleigh
Wake Citizens Association?
If
you have no legal experience… perfect! This is a great “getting your feet wet”
case for reading legal decisions! This post will analyze the recent ruling by the 4th Circuit section by section, while referencing the dissent as
well as the majority opinion. For those who are not experienced reading a legal
decision:
-I
have prefaced my analysis with a brief explanation of each section of the
decision and why it’s important
-I
have opted to use simple page numbers as citations, rather than proper legal
format
-I
have tried to keep the legal jargon to a minimum.
-And,
where possible, you’ll see bulleted lists like this one.
-For
this post series, I’ll also critique the majority opinion as necessary
Did the 4th Circuit Decide Wrongly In This Case? (Part III-A and III-B)
Did
the 4th Circuit Wrongly Decide Raleigh
Wake Citizens Association?
If
you have no legal experience… perfect! This is a great “getting your feet wet”
case for reading legal decisions! This post series will analyze the recent ruling by the 4th Circuit section by section, while referencing the dissent as
well as the majority opinion. For those who are not experienced reading a legal
decision:
-I
have prefaced my analysis with a brief explanation of each section of the
decision and why it’s important
-I
have opted to use simple page numbers as citations, rather than proper legal
format
-I
have tried to keep the legal jargon to a minimum.
-And,
where possible, you’ll see bulleted lists like this one.
-For
this post series, I’ll also critique the majority opinion as necessaryDid the 4th Circuit Wrongly Decide in This Case? (Table of Contents for Part III)
Did
the 4th Circuit Wrongly Decide Raleigh
Wake Citizens Association?
If
you have no legal experience… perfect! This is a great “getting your feet wet”
case for reading legal decisions! This post series will analyze the recent ruling by the 4th Circuit section by section, while referencing the dissent as
well as the majority opinion. For those who are not experienced reading a legal
decision:
-I
have prefaced my analysis with a brief explanation of each section of the
decision and why it’s important
-I
have opted to use simple page numbers as citations, rather than proper legal
format
-I
have tried to keep the legal jargon to a minimum.
-And,
where possible, you’ll see bulleted lists like this one.
-For
these posts, I’ll also critique the majority opinion as necessary
Part III – Analysis
This
is the heart of the case, where the court explains its legal reasoning. I’m not
going to detail everything in this Part of the opinion, because affirming a
lower court is essentially the appellate court saying “They got this right /
didn’t get it wrong, so we’re not changing anything.” It’s the time-consuming
part of following a legal opinion, as you’ll see after the jump. Keep reading,
though – this is also the fun part!
Tuesday, July 5, 2016
Did the 4th Circuit Wrongly Decide In This Case? (Summary, Fact Statement, and Standard of Review)
Did
the 4th Circuit Wrongly Decide Raleigh
Wake Citizens Association?
If
you have no legal experience… perfect! This is a great “getting your feet wet”
case for reading legal decisions! This post will analyze the recent ruling by
the United States Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit section by section, while referencing the dissent as
well as the majority opinion. For those who are not experienced reading a legal
decision:
-I
have prefaced my analysis with a brief explanation of each section of the
decision and why it’s important
-I
have opted to use simple page numbers as citations, rather than proper legal format
-I
have tried to keep the legal jargon to a minimum.
-And,
where possible, you’ll see bulleted lists like this one.
KEY
ISSUE TO KNOW BEFORE CONTINUING
-The
key issue in this case is apportionment and population deviation. High variance
between the population of the smallest district and largest district (The
Maximum Population Deviation) is not ideal.
-10%
variance in Maximum Population Deviation is a key number, and the recently
redrawn Wake County districts are under 10% MPD.
Sunday, July 3, 2016
Upcoming Guide to the 4th Circuit decision
Government Lab will have a guide to the recent decision, including the facts and reasoning, posted this week.
I may not be able to consider myself a politician currently, but I can still explain legal reasoning in non-legal terms. I'll keep you posted!
Friday, July 1, 2016
Presented Without Comment
Read T. Keung Hui's article on this situation, read the opinion here, and keep your fingers crossed!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)